石油化工设计 ›› 2023, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 34-36.doi: 10.3969 /j.issn.1005 -8168.2023.01.009

• 工程应用 • 上一篇    

智能P&ID软件应用情况及功能对比

张硕昌   

  1. 中国石化工程建设有限公司,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-05 接受日期:2022-07-05 出版日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2023-03-07
  • 通讯作者: 张硕昌,zhangshuochang@sei.com.cn E-mail:zhangshuochang@sei.com.cn
  • 作者简介:张硕昌,男,2013年毕业于英国曼彻斯特大学高级控制与系统工程专业,理学硕士,工程师,主要从事石油化工行业数字化交付方面的工作。联系电话:010-84875314;E-mail: zhangshuochang@sei.com.cn

Application and Comparative Analysis of Smart P&ID software

Zhang Shuochang   

  1. SINOPEC Engineering Incorporation,Beijing,100101
  • Received:2022-07-05 Accepted:2022-07-05 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-03-07
  • Contact: Zhang Shuochang,zhangshuochang@sei.com.cn E-mail:zhangshuochang@sei.com.cn

摘要: 智能P&ID软件是能源化工行业工程项目设计的重要组成部分。在最短时间内交付高质量的成品文件是设计单位在行业内打造竞争优势的关键因素之一。因此,对于设计单位而言,智能P&ID软件的选择尤为重要。本文系统地对比了3款智能P&ID软件,以及目前设计中常用的Auto CAD绘图软件,分析并对比了各款软件的优劣势

关键词: 智能P&ID, SmartPlant P&ID, AVEVA Diagrams, COMOS P&ID, Auto CAD

Abstract: Smart P&ID software is essential to engineering projects in energy and chemical industry. Delivering high-quality finished documents in the shortest time is one of the key factors for design companies to create competitive advantages in the industry. Thus, the selection of smart P&ID software is particularly important for design companies. This paper compares three smart P&ID software and the commonly used AutoCAD, and discusses their advantages and disadvantages.

Key words: Smart P&ID, SmartPlant P&ID, AVEVA Diagrams, COMOS P&ID, Auto CAD